Claims

The most frequently referenced theoretical backgrounds are the 3P Model (2.69%), Cognitive Load Theory (1.84%), and Conceptual Change approaches (1.51%), and most studies are atheoretical

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Even the most frequently mentioned theory, the 3P model, was referenced in fewer than 3% of the 13,507 publications, indicating no dominant theory of prior knowledge. → Bittermann 2023

Evidence

Bittermann 2023

Bittermann, A., McNamara, D., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2023). The Landscape of Research on Prior Knowledge and Learning: a Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9

q3 · i? · review · r2

Frequency analysis of theory mentions in abstracts, titles, and metadata of the full corpus (Figure 4); the article notes the 3P model appeared in only 363 publications and that most studies had a rather atheoretical approach.

"the 3P (presage, process, product) model of learning (used in 2.69 % of the 13,507 publications in the corpus), Cognitive Load Theory (1.84 %) and Conceptual Change approaches (1.51 %) were the most frequently mentioned theoretical backgrounds"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id atheoretical-prior-knowledge-literature
title The most frequently referenced theoretical backgrounds are the 3P Model (2.69%), Cognitive Load Theory (1.84%), and Conceptual Change approaches (1.51%), and most studies are atheoretical
description The most frequently referenced theoretical backgrounds are the 3P Model (2.69%), Cognitive Load Theory (1.84%), and Conceptual Change approaches (1.51%), and most studies are atheoretical
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bittermann-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.