Claims

The short-term effect of audio input enhancement on intensifier knowledge is not stable over a three-week delay

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's performance on the delayed post-test did not differ significantly from its immediate post-test performance, so the second null hypothesis was confirmed. → Negari 2018

Evidence

Negari 2018

Negari, G. M., Azizi, A., & Arani, D. K. (2018). Investigating the Effectiveness of Audio Input Enhancement on EFL Learners’ Retention of Intensifiers. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1119a

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Paired samples t-test on the experimental group (n=23) comparing immediate post-test and delayed post-test administered three weeks later. The article reports the difference was "not statistically significant , t (22) = .21, p >.05"; equivalence was not tested.

"the difference between the participants’ performance on the post -test (M= 9.57, SD=2.59) and the delayed post -test (M=9.39, SD, 2.25) was not statistically significant , t (22) = .21, p >.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.