Graduate students viewed personalization and critical modification of AI-generated content as necessary for maintaining authorship¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Participants emphasized critically evaluating and modifying COREI's output to preserve their own writing style and voice, treating AI content as a starting point rather than a final product. → Soroush Sabbaghan 2025

Evidence¶

Soroush Sabbaghan 2025¶

Soroush Sabbaghan, & Sarah Elaine Eaton. (2025). Navigating the Ethical Frontier: Graduate Students' Experiences with Generative AI-Mediated Scholarship. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00454-6

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Thematic finding from the interview study. One participant stated, "I think it's your writing after you've tweaked it a bit," indicating substantial revision was needed for the work to feel like the participant's own.

"Participants considered the implications of using AI-generated content for authorship, emphasizing the importance of personalizing the output and maintaining their own writing style and voice."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Graduate students reported maintaining or gaining a sense of agency when working with a GenAI research assistant — related