Most surveyed students actively engaged in resolving coding errors based on automarker feedback¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 37 survey responses indicated students actively engaged in resolving coding errors based on automarker feedback; one reported not making full use of feedback and one had never used the automarker. → Andre L. C. Barczak 2023

Evidence¶

Andre L. C. Barczak 2023¶

Andre L. C. Barczak, Anuradha Mathrani, Binglan Han, Napoleon H. Reyes. (2023). Automated assessment system for programming courses: a case study for teaching data structures and algorithms. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10277-2

q2 · i? · design · r2

Self-reflection survey questions gauging know-why asked whether test-case feedback helped debugging and how actively students worked to pass all test cases. The article reports 37 positive responses, one student not using the feedback fully, and one who had never used the automarker.

"Students gave positive responses to both these questions with 37 responses indicating that they had actively engaged in resolving coding errors based on the automarker feedback, with one student saying that he did not make full use of this feedback, while one other had never used the automarker."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students reported that automarker clues and comments were extremely helpful for completing their programming assignments — related
• Students surveyed in a DSA course perceived the automarker as a formative instructional strategy that supported experiential learning of programming — related