Automated scoring practice produced a significant time × group interaction on total interpreting scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 A 2 × 2 mixed ANOVA on total scores showed a significant main effect of time and a significant time × group interaction (η2ₚ = 0.29). → Chen C and Liu T 2026
Evidence¶
Chen C and Liu T 2026¶
Chen C and Liu T (2026) Impact of automated scoring on interpreting performance and self-regulated learning: evidence from a pedagogical experiment. Front. Psychol. 17:1867463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1867463
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
The 2 (Group) × 2 (Time) mixed-design ANOVA on total scores found a main effect of time and an interaction with a large printed effect size, "η2ₚ = 0.29" for the interaction and η2ₚ = 0.52 for time; the article states both exceed conventional thresholds for a large effect.
"There was a significant main effect of time [ F(1, 44) = 46.83, p < 0.001, η2ₚ = 0.52], showing improvement in both groups, and a significant time × group interaction [ F(1, 44) = 18.00, p < 0.001, η2ₚ = 0.29]"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student interpreters who practiced with an automated scoring system outperformed the control group on total interpreting scores at post-test — related
- Gains from automated scoring concentrated in linguistic accuracy and logical coherence but were absent in information fidelity and delivery fluency — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
automated-scoring-time-group-interaction-total-scores |
title |
Automated scoring practice produced a significant time × group interaction on total interpreting scores |
description |
Automated scoring practice produced a significant time × group interaction on total interpreting scores |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — chen-c-and-liu-t-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.