Claims

Autonomous motivation types positively relate to school achievement while controlled types show weak negative or null relations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · review r2 · q3 · i0–i1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Intrinsic motivation (d = .27) and identified regulation (d = .35) are positively associated with school achievement. → Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023 q3 i0 Introjected (d = −.12) and external regulation (d = −.22) show weak but significant negative associations with academic achievement in one meta-analysis, but no significant relations in another. → Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023 (2)

Evidence

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

q3 · i1 · review · r2

Meta-analysis reported in the self-determination theory section found "positive associa- tions of intrinsic motivation (d = .27) and identified regulation (d = .35) with school achievement."

"Concerning the autonomous motivation types, Taylor et al. (2014) reported positive associa- tions of intrinsic motivation (d = .27) and identified regulation (d = .35) with school achievement."

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023 (2)

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

q3 · i0 · theoretical · r3

The same meta-analysis found "weak but significant negative associations with academic achievement for introjected (d = − .12) and external regulation (d = − .22)."

"Taylor et al. (2014) reported weak but significant negative associations with academic achievement for introjected (d = − .12) and external regulation (d = − .22)."

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023 (3)

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

q3 · i? · review · r2

A second meta-analysis reported in the same section found introjected and external regulation "not significantly related" to self-reported or objective school performance; equivalence was not tested.

"Howard et al. (2021) found that introjected and external regulation were not significantly related to self-reported (introjected ρ = .07, external ρ = − .02) or objective school performance (introjected ρ = − .01, external ρ = − .03)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id autonomous-vs-controlled-motivation-achievement
title Autonomous motivation types positively relate to school achievement while controlled types show weak negative or null relations
description Autonomous motivation types positively relate to school achievement while controlled types show weak negative or null relations
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — detlef-urhahne-lisette-wijnia-2023, detlef-urhahne-lisette-wijnia-2023-2, detlef-urhahne-lisette-wijnia-2023-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.