Lower auditory working memory capacity moderates the training benefit: participants 1 SD below the mean improve significantly more after immersive than auditory training¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-26 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A significant two-way interaction between training modality and auditory working memory, with post-hoc tests showing significantly greater SNR improvement after immersive training for lower-AWM participants, but no modality difference for higher-AWM participants. → Vanessa Frei & Nathalie Giroud 2025
Evidence¶
Vanessa Frei & Nathalie Giroud 2025¶
Vanessa Frei & Nathalie Giroud. (2025). Immersive auditory-cognitive training improves speech-in-noise perception in older adults with varying hearing and working memory. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00306-5
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Post-hoc comparisons (emmeans) on the linear mixed model of training-induced SNR change, treating AWM as a continuous moderator; the interaction Δχ²(1) = 9.143, p = 0.002, with the quoted post-hoc at p < 0.001. Participants were not grouped into high/low categories.
"a participant with lower AWM capacity (i.e., 1 SD below the mean) experienced a signi ficantly greater improvement in SNR f ollowing the immersive training compared to the auditory training (AWM 1 SD below average: ChangeAU– ChangeIM:Δβ = −0.677, SE = 0.148,t = −4.561, p < 0.001)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Auditory Processing — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
- Working Memory — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- More pronounced hearing loss moderates the training benefit: participants with PTA 1 SD above the mean improve significantly more after immersive than auditory training — related
- Age, general cognition (MoCA), visual working memory, and hearing loss showed no significant association with the extent of training-induced change, and the three-way modality-by-AWM-by-hearing-loss interaction was not significant — related
- Speech-in-noise perception improves significantly after a short-term immersive auditory-cognitive training, but not after an audio-only training session — related
- Immersive presentation keeps comprehension performance stable across a training session while auditory-only performance decreases toward the end — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
awm-moderates-immersive-training-benefit |
title |
Lower auditory working memory capacity moderates the training benefit: participants 1 SD below the mean improve significantly more after immersive than auditory training |
description |
Lower auditory working memory capacity moderates the training benefit: participants 1 SD below the mean improve significantly more after immersive than auditory training |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-26 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — vanessa-frei-nathalie-giroud-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.