After 8 weeks, the AWT experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on all five writing criteria, with lower error count¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Mann Whitney U tests after the application showed meaningful differences favouring the experimental group on adequacy of the word count (p=0.005), form of constructed sentences (p=0.015), punctuation (p=0.005), relevancy in writing (p=0.009) and error count (p=0.003). → Nazife Burcu TAKIL 2016

Evidence¶

Nazife Burcu TAKIL 2016¶

Nazife Burcu TAKIL. (2016). The use of “ask, write, throw” technique as a writing skill practice when teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2682

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post-test Mann Whitney U comparison of the 18-learner AWT group and 17-learner control group after 8 weeks. Table 6 reports z values of 2.762, 2.414, 2.788, 2.581 and 2.903; the experimental group "scored higher than the control group; also the error count went down."

"a meaningful distinction between the writing skills of the control group and the experimental group has occurred over the chosen criteria after the application of the technique (p<0.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Before the intervention, the AWT experimental group and the traditional-instruction control group showed no significant difference on any of the five writing-skill criteria — related
• The control group's writing skills also improved significantly over the 8 weeks under traditional instruction — related