Claims

Background demographic factors show mixed and outcome-dependent associations: age and gender relate differently to wellbeing versus depression and stress outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Older student age was associated with greater psychological wellbeing but also with greater depression and stress, marking it as protective for one outcome and risk for others. → Ball 2025 q2 i? Gender had a negative association with all outcomes except overall adjustment, meaning males scored lower on positively framed outcomes (a risk) and lower on negatively framed outcomes like depression (protective). → Ball 2025 (2)

Evidence

Ball 2025

Ball, I., Banerjee, M., Holliman, A., & Tyndall, I. (2025). Investigating Success in the Transition to University: A Systematic Review of Personal Risk and Protective Factors Influencing Psychosocial Success. https://osf.io/vxu5q?view_only=ee23e20f57c54891b842c92b7a4858de

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of background demographic factors (Table A4); the review reports age was protective for psychological wellbeing (Bowman et al., 2010) but positively associated with depression and stress (Busseri et al., 2011), and suggests limited variance in age may explain the divergence.

"age appeared to be a protective factor in relation to psychological wellbeing (Bowman et al., 2010), where older students are associated with greater wellbeing"

Ball 2025 (2)

Ball, I., Banerjee, M., Holliman, A., & Tyndall, I. (2025). Investigating Success in the Transition to University: A Systematic Review of Personal Risk and Protective Factors Influencing Psychosocial Success. https://osf.io/vxu5q?view_only=ee23e20f57c54891b842c92b7a4858de

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports that being male is a risk factor for positively framed outcomes (e.g., academic adjustment) but protective for negatively framed outcomes (e.g., depression), and that not being Caucasian was broadly a risk factor. No effect sizes are printed.

"Other than with overall adjustment, gender had a negative association with all the outcomes it was investigated with"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id background-factors-mixed-outcome-dependent
title Background demographic factors show mixed and outcome-dependent associations: age and gender relate differently to wellbeing versus depression and stress outcomes
description Background demographic factors show mixed and outcome-dependent associations: age and gender relate differently to wellbeing versus depression and stress outcomes
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ball-2025, ball-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.