Claims

A larger percentage of BCIRC students met the bilingual education exit criterion in reading (32% versus 10%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 32% of BCIRC third graders scored above the 40th percentile on the NAPT reading test, qualifying to exit bilingual education, versus 10% of comparison students; the reported effect size was 0.87 and statistically significant. → Bilingual Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition 2007

Evidence

Bilingual Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition 2007

Bilingual Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition. (2007). WWC Intervention Report. U.S. Department of Education, What Works Clearinghouse. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED405428

q2 · i3 · causal · r?

Exit-criterion finding from the Calderón, Hertz-Lazarowitz, and Slavin (1998) quasi-experiment, reported in Appendix A4.1 for 118 third graders with a printed effect size of 0.87, statistically significant, improvement index +31. The WWC summary calls this "an important and promising finding".

"At the end of third grade, 32% of students in the BCIRC group scored above the 40th percentile on the Norm-Referenced Assessment Program for Texas (NAPT) reading test, qualifying them to exit their bilingual education program. By contrast, only 10% of students in the comparison group met this criterion."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id bcirc-higher-reading-exit-criterion-rate
title A larger percentage of BCIRC students met the bilingual education exit criterion in reading (32% versus 10%)
description A larger percentage of BCIRC students met the bilingual education exit criterion in reading (32% versus 10%)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bilingual-cooperative-integrated-reading-and-composition-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.