Claims

Body donor models are perceived by postgraduate trainees as authentic and of high educational value for laparoscopic training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the review's included studies, trainees rated body donor models highly for authenticity and educational value in laparoscopic training. → Pinar Sedat Alp 2025

Evidence

Pinar Sedat Alp 2025

Pinar Sedat Alp, Morrow Joseph J., Kong Chia Yew. (2025). A systematic review of the use of human body donor models for postgraduate laparoscopic surgical training. Anatomical Science International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-025-00872-z

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of questionnaire studies in the review; this entry reports the Giger et al. satisfaction data as the review presents it, with mean satisfaction scores of "4.0. for colorectal, 4.2 for hernia, 5.0 for bariatric, and 4.1 for vascular surgery". No effect sizes are printed.

"Giger et al. (2008) assessed TEBDs for their use in laparoscopic bariatric, vascular, hernia, and colorectal surgery training revealed mean satisfaction scores of 4.0. for colorectal, 4.2 for hernia, 5.0 for bariatric, and 4.1 for vascular surgery."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.