Claims

Word reading efficiency and sentence comprehension show distinct behavioral subcomponent profiles: word reading correlates with phonological subcomponents, comprehension with morphological awareness and orthography-semantic mapping

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Word reading efficiency correlated significantly with phonological representation (r = 0.643), phonological awareness (r = 0.516), orthography-phonology mapping (r = 0.662) and orthography-semantic mapping (r = 0.536), but not with morphological awareness (r = 0.165, p = 0.513) or orthographical processing (r = 0.149, p = 0.555). → Xia Zhichao 2018 q2 i? Sentence reading comprehension correlated significantly with morphological awareness (r = 0.502), orthographic processing (r = 0.505), orthography-semantic mapping (r = 0.772, p < 0.001) and phonological representation (r = 0.508). → Xia Zhichao 2018 (2)

Evidence

Xia Zhichao 2018

Xia Zhichao, Zhang Linjun, Hoeft Fumiko, Gu Bin, Gong Gaolang, Shu Hua. (2018). Neural Correlates of Oral Word Reading, Silent Reading Comprehension, and Cognitive Subcomponents. International Journal of Behavioral Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417727872

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Pearson's correlations between behavioral measures (n = 21) controlling for age, gender and performance IQ, reported in the Results section. The correlations with morphological awareness and orthographical processing were not significant.

"Word reading efficiency was also significantly correlated with several subcomponents including phonological representation (r = 0.643, p = 0.004), phonological awareness (r = 0.516, p = 0.029), orthography-phonology mapping (r = 0.662, p = 0.003) and orthography-semantic mapping (r = 0.536, p = 0.022)."

Xia Zhichao 2018 (2)

Xia Zhichao, Zhang Linjun, Hoeft Fumiko, Gu Bin, Gong Gaolang, Shu Hua. (2018). Neural Correlates of Oral Word Reading, Silent Reading Comprehension, and Cognitive Subcomponents. International Journal of Behavioral Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417727872

q2 · i? · associational · r1

The same behavioral correlation analysis in the Results section shows sentence comprehension correlated with morphological awareness (r = 0.502, p = 0.034) and orthographic processing (r = 0.505, p = 0.032), and with two of three phonological subcomponents.

"Sentence reading comprehension was also significantly correlated with orthography-semantic mapping (r = 0.772, p < 0.001) and two out of the three phonological subcomponents (phonological representation: r = 0.508, p = 0.032; phonological awareness: r = 0.203, p = 0.418; orthography-phonology mapping: r = 0.621, p = 0.006)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id behavioral-subcomponent-dissociation-word-comprehension
title Word reading efficiency and sentence comprehension show distinct behavioral subcomponent profiles: word reading correlates with phonological subcomponents, comprehension with morphological awareness and orthography-semantic mapping
description Word reading efficiency and sentence comprehension show distinct behavioral subcomponent profiles: word reading correlates with phonological subcomponents, comprehension with morphological awareness and orthography-se...
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — xia-zhichao-2018, xia-zhichao-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.