Claims

Teacher beliefs explain variance in computer use comparable to technology-related variables

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Adding teacher beliefs to the multilevel model increased explained variance about as much as adding the technology-related variables. → Hermans 2008

Evidence

Hermans 2008

Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Stepwise multilevel modelling compared the variance explained by each variable subset. Adding beliefs raised R² by 7.3% at teacher level and 9.7% at school level, versus 7.2% and 9.8% respectively for the technology-related variables — a comparable contribution.

"Correspondingly, by adding teacher beliefs to Model 2b, the results show an increase of 7.3% at teacher level and 9.7% at school level (Model 3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.