Claims

A five-week school-based music therapy program for bereaved students captured no statistically significant survey benefits but well-endorsed interview-reported benefits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Survey analysis of the Bereavement Group (five students, 14 scales) showed improvement on five scales but none statistically significant, while interviews reported benefits such as increased social connection (n=5/5) and affect (n=5/5). → Crooke 2014

Evidence

Crooke 2014

Crooke, A. H. D., & McFerran, K. S. (2014). Recommendations for the investigation and delivery of music programs aimed at achieving psychosocial wellbeing benefits in mainstream schools. Australian Journal of Music Education, 2014(1), 15-37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1061963

q2 · i? · design · r2

Pre-post survey evaluation of a weekly five-week school-based music therapy program for six bereaved students, with surveys and interviews conducted with five students. The article reports "no scale results were statistically significant" despite interview-reported benefits.

"No PSWB benefits were captured in the analysis of the survey data. Mean change scores did show improvement on 5 scales, yet no scale results were statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.