Claims

In one video study of Betty's Brain, 77% of the feedback delivered by the agents was ignored by students.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Struggling students largely did not attend to or implement the strategy suggestions provided by Mr. Davis and Betty. → Gautam Biswas 2016

Evidence

Gautam Biswas 2016

Gautam Biswas, James R. Segedy, Kritya Bunchongchit. (2016). From Design to Implementation to Practice: a Learning by Teaching System: Betty's Brain. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0057-9

q2 · i? · review · r2

Video data analysis of students using Betty's Brain found that "77 % of the feedback delivered by Betty and Mr. Davis were ignored by students"; the paper reports no effect size and attributes this to underdeveloped cognitive skills.

"In one study, we analyzed video data from students using Betty's Brain and found that 77 % of the feedback delivered by Betty and Mr. Davis were ignored by students (Segedy et al. 2012b)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id betty-brain-feedback-ignored-77-percent
title In one video study of Betty's Brain, 77% of the feedback delivered by the agents was ignored by students.
description In one video study of Betty's Brain, 77% of the feedback delivered by the agents was ignored by students.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gautam-biswas-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.