Students in the Bidirectional SLE report significantly better impressions of technological adoption, collaboration, and meaningfulness than students in the Traditional SLE¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Pérez-Sanagustín 2015: the intervention came bundled with another change; groups were assigned but students were analysed as independent (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-29)
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? EG students rated technological adoption (T), collaboration (C), and meaningfulness (M) significantly higher than CG students on all three Mann-Whitney tests. → Pérez-Sanagustín 2015
Evidence¶
Pérez-Sanagustín 2015¶
Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Soldani, X., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2015). Lessons Learned from the Design of Situated Learning Environments to Support Collaborative Knowledge Construction. Computers & Education, 87, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.019
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Likert-form comparison of the same experiment: 12 statements across categories T, C and M scored 1-5 at session end, category scores averaged per student and compared between groups with Mann-Whitney tests; medians were, for example, T: 3.5 (CG) vs "4.00" (EG), U=5161, p=0.000; C: 3.75 vs 4.00, U=6192, p=0.000; M: 4.00 vs 4.50, U=5802, p=0.001.
"Students in the EG reported significant ly higher values in their evaluation of the learning experience in terms of technological adoption (T), collaboration (C), and the meaningfulness of the activity as a whole (M), compared to those in the CG."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students in the Bidirectional QR-code SLE receive significantly higher completeness scores than students in the Traditional SLE — related
- Students working in a Bidirectional QR-code SLE receive significantly higher teacher-assigned correctness scores than students in a Traditional SLE — related
- The Bidirectional SLE's advantage over the Traditional SLE in correctness and completeness is significant for open questions but not for closed questions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
bidirectional-sle-better-impressions |
title |
Students in the Bidirectional SLE report significantly better impressions of technological adoption, collaboration, and meaningfulness than students in the Traditional SLE |
description |
Students in the Bidirectional SLE report significantly better impressions of technological adoption, collaboration, and meaningfulness than students in the Traditional SLE |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pérez-sanagustín-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.