Claims

Bilingual immunology teaching significantly increases the percentage of Chinese undergraduates achieving course scores above 80

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among Chinese undergraduates, bilingual immunology teaching produced a statistically significant improvement in the proportion of students with course scores above 80 (RD = 0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.80, p < 0.001). → Ji Pengyu 2026

Evidence

Ji Pengyu 2026

Ji Pengyu, Li Qianqian, Li Na, Zhang Lin. (2026). The efficacy of bilingual immunology teaching on undergraduates in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08725-7

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of four non-randomized studies (594 participants) synthesized with a random effects model in Review Manager 5.3, reporting "a RD of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.80, p < 0.001)" for course performance. Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 96%).

"A statistically significant improvement in course performance was observed among students who received bilingual teaching, with a RD of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.80, p < 0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.