Claims

The Terman Binet and Healy Picture Completion tests give extremely different classifications of the same children, with only 44.44 per cent of 65 cases receiving the same rough classification

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1920 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 65 children tested by both the Terman Binet and Healy Picture Completion tests, 29 (44.44 per cent) received the same rough classification and 36 (55.56 per cent) received different classifications. → E. B. Skaggs 1920

Evidence

E. B. Skaggs 1920

E. B. Skaggs. (1920). A Comparison of Results Obtained by the Terman Binet Tests and the Healy Picture Completion Test. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076088

q2 · i? · associational · r1

A comparative study of 65 children, mostly tested at a school in Ann Arbor and a hospital social service department, classifying each child as below, at, or above chronological age on both tests. The article reports that "44.44 per cent give the same" classification and 55.56 per cent differ; no inferential test is reported.

"of the 65 cases: 29 or 44.44 per cent give the same "rough" classification. 36 or 55.56 per cent give different classification."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id binet-healy-different-classifications-65-cases
title The Terman Binet and Healy Picture Completion tests give extremely different classifications of the same children, with only 44.44 per cent of 65 cases receiving the same rough classification
description The Terman Binet and Healy Picture Completion tests give extremely different classifications of the same children, with only 44.44 per cent of 65 cases receiving the same rough classification
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1920
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — e-b-skaggs-1920

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.