Claims

In BioWorld, expert-like initial problem representation and library use correlate with expert-like evidence collection and diagnostic-test ordering

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2001 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Proportion of expert symptoms collected during problem representation correlated with overall expert-like evidence collected (r = 0.59). → Lajoie 2001 q3 i3 Library use correlated with ordering expert-like diagnostic tests (r = 0.42). → Lajoie 2001 (2)

Evidence

Lajoie 2001

Lajoie, S. P., Lavigne, N. C., Guerrera, C., & Munsie, S. D. (2001). Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science, 29(2), 155-186. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41953546

q3 · i3 · associational · r1

Pearson correlational analysis of computer-trace data from 20 groups, comparing student actions to expert benchmarks. The correlation between "proportion of expert symptoms collected during problem representation" and overall expert-like evidence was r = 0.59, p = 0.002.

"This analysis revealed a significant correlation between proportion of expert symptoms collected during problem representation and overall evidence collected that was expert-like ( r = 0.59, p = 0.002)."

Lajoie 2001 (2)

Lajoie, S. P., Lavigne, N. C., Guerrera, C., & Munsie, S. D. (2001). Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science, 29(2), 155-186. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41953546

q3 · i3 · design · r2

Same correlational analysis of BioWorld trace data: library entries (declarative knowledge) positively correlated with expert-like diagnostic tests ordered, r = 0.42, p = 0.04. The authors also report high evidence collectors scored highly on expert-like tests (r = 49, p = 0.02).

"The declarative knowledge acquired in the library was positively correlated with the proportion of expert-like diagnostic tests ordered (r = 0.42, p = 0.04)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id bioworld-feature-use-expert-correlations
title In BioWorld, expert-like initial problem representation and library use correlate with expert-like evidence collection and diagnostic-test ordering
description In BioWorld, expert-like initial problem representation and library use correlate with expert-like evidence collection and diagnostic-test ordering
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2001
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — lajoie-2001, lajoie-2001-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.