Blackboard-based blended teaching produced significantly higher academic achievement than traditional teaching, with η² = 0.75¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · q2 quasi-experiment
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Female university students taught by Blackboard-based blended teaching scored significantly higher on the post achievement test than the traditionally taught control group, with η² = 0.75 rated very high. → Wadha H. Al-Otaibi 2017

q2 i? Eta squared for the blended teaching effect on academic achievement was 0.75, described as a very high rate. → Wadha H. Al-Otaibi 2017

Evidence¶

Wadha H. Al-Otaibi 2017¶

Wadha H. Al-Otaibi. (2017). The Effectiveness of Blackboard-Based Blended Teaching in the Development of Academic Achievement, Study Skills and Self-Confidence among Students of Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University. International Education Studies, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p100

q2 · i?

Quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group study of 38 female students (experimental 21, control 17); ANCOVA on post-achievement test adjusted for pre-test. The article reports "statistically significant differences in the total academic achievement and its sub-levels" favoring the experimental group (means 17.14 vs 6.82).

"Table 10 shows statistically significant differences in the total academic achievement and its sub-levels. (F) Value of total academic achievement and its lower and higher levels rated (103.3, 27.6 and 87.9,) respectively."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Blackboard-based blended teaching showed no statistically significant effect on university study skills — related
• Blackboard-based instruction produced statistically significant pre-to-post achievement gains in the EFL teaching methods course for the experimental group — related
• Blackboard-based instruction was more effective than traditional instruction in improving post-test achievement, with the experimental group outperforming the control group — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)