Claims

University students in a blended learning German course showed significantly greater motivation gains than students in a traditional face-to-face course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The group-by-measurement interaction for motivation toward German classes was significant, favoring the blended learning group. → Isiguzel 2014

Evidence

Isiguzel 2014

Isiguzel, B. (2014). The blended learning environment on the foreign language learning process: A balance for motivation and achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 15(3), Article 10. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1043673

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Motivation was measured with the 20-item German Language Learning Motivation Scale (Cronbach alpha 0.71 in this study) as pretest and posttest in the same 62-student quasi-experiment. Motivation rose from 57.80 to 74.77 (experimental) versus 59.33 to 62.70 (control).

"the learning environments have a significant effect on the repeated measurement factors of motivation towards German language classes on both groups. [F (1-60)= 20.384, p< .005]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.