Claims

The review reports that students' views of the blended learning process differ according to their learning styles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the study the review attributes to Akkoyunlu and Meryem (2008), students' views on the blended learning process, such as easy use of the web environment, differed according to their learning styles. → Suprabha. K 2015

Evidence

Suprabha. K 2015

Suprabha. K, & Subramonian, G. (2015). Blended learning approach for enhancing students learning experiences in a knowledge society. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098578

q2 · i? · review · r1

The review reports, citing Akkoyunlu and Meryem (2008), a study of student perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles, finding that "students' views on blended learning process, such as easy use of the web environment differs according to their learning styles". No effect size is printed.

"Akkoyunlu, B., and Meryem, Y. S. (2008), have studied student's perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Results revealed that students' views on blended learning process, such as easy use of the web environment differs according to their learning styles."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.