BLEU produced low scores when ensembled with other techniques, possibly due to brevity penalty over-penalization, so it was excluded from the ensemble¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? BLEU was dropped from the ensemble after producing low scores, attributed to possible brevity penalty over-penalization. → Automatic Summary Assessment for Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2009
Evidence¶
Automatic Summary Assessment for Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2009¶
Automatic Summary Assessment for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. (2009). Preprint submitted to Elsevier February 26, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.008
q1 · i? · design · r2
Authors' interpretation of their evaluation of four techniques: BLEU "produced low scores in its performance when ensembled with other techniques", attributed to "the brevity penalty over penalization". This is an author interpretation rather than a tested result.
"However, we found that BLEU produced low scores in its perfor- mance when ensembled with other techniques. This might due to the brevity penalty over penalization."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
bleu-excluded-brevity-penalty |
title |
BLEU produced low scores when ensembled with other techniques, possibly due to brevity penalty over-penalization, so it was excluded from the ensemble |
description |
BLEU produced low scores when ensembled with other techniques, possibly due to brevity penalty over-penalization, so it was excluded from the ensemble |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — automatic-summary-assessment-for-intelligent-tutoring-systems-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.