The Block 3 novel stimulus reliably decreased accuracy only in the age-matched group, whose decrease exceeded that of the other groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The Block 3 introduction of a new sound-pair mapping to an already-associated visual symbol tended to decrease performance in all groups, but the decrease was reliably different from zero only in the age-matched group and was larger than in the DD and reading-matched groups. → Pasqualotto 2025

Evidence¶

Pasqualotto 2025¶

Pasqualotto, A., Cochrane, A., Venuti, P. et al. (2025). Impaired audio-visual associations in dyslexia: evidence beyond linguistic processing. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00382-7

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Bayesian offset coefficient for the Block 3 stimulus introduction, visible in both waves separately (Wave 1 mean = -0.359; Wave 2 mean = -0.329). Group comparisons showed the age-matched decrease was larger than the DD group's (mean = -0.285) and the reading-matched group's (mean = -0.239).

"the decrease was reliably different from zero change only in the age-matched group (mean = -0.348, CI95 = [-0.47,-0.222])"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Introducing a novel audio-visual pairing in Block 2 produced a reliable accuracy decrease only among reading-matched controls — related