Claims

Blogging was perceived as useful for venting emotions and providing social support between peers in most studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Nine studies without control groups and exclusively using self-reported data indicated students perceived blogging as useful for venting emotions and giving social support between peers. → Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Evidence

Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Carlos R. del Blanco, Ivan García-Magariño. (2018). The use of blogs in the education field: A qualitative systematic review. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05421

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis of the social-support category: 10 of 12 studies lacked a control group and ten of twelve exclusively used self-reported data. The review reports students "perceived the blogging activity as useful for venting emotions, and give social sup port be- tween peers".

"The overall results of the nine studies that did not have a control a nd were exclusively based on self-reported data indicated that students p erceived the blogging activity as useful for venting emotions, and give social sup port be- tween peers."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.