Claims

Theoretical BLS knowledge outcomes do not differ between instructor-led sessions and self-directed computer CD/DVD learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants showed no differences in acquired knowledge between those receiving instructor-led theoretical sessions and those learning independently via computer CDs or DVDs. → García-Suárez 2019

Evidence

García-Suárez 2019

García-Suárez, M., Méndez-Martínez, C., Martínez-Isasi, S., Gómez-Salgado, J., & Fernández-García, D. (2019). Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050768

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's conclusions section synthesises knowledge outcomes across the included trials, reporting no differences between instructor-led theory and self-directed CD/DVD learning; no effect size is printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"With regard to the knowledge acquired, participants did not show differences between those who received a theoretical session with an instructor and participants who acquired knowledge independently through computer CDs or DVDs."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.