BMM expands the P3N1 latency interval, with frontal-channel group effects at F3, Fp2, and Fz¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The composite P3N1 latency index increased by 25.52 ms in BMM sessions (p < 0.05), reflecting a larger temporal separation between early sensory encoding and later evaluative processing. → Huang 2026
q3 i2 Channel-level ANCOVA showed significant group effects on the P3N1 latency index at F3 (η2 = 0.083) and Fp2 (η2 = 0.092), with a borderline effect at Fz (η2 = 0.066). → Huang 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Huang 2026¶
Huang, Y., Guo, J.-H., Zheng, S., Yin, R., Wang, J. & Jiang, C.-L. (2026). Enhancing attention network and neural efficiency through brief mindfulness meditation. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00455-1
q3 · i? · causal · r2
ERP latency analysis of participant-level grand averages (16 channels) in the 18-day BMM study; P3 latency delayed ~14.5 ms and N1 advanced ~10.9 ms, so "P3N1 latency (LL) increased by 25.52 ms in BMM sessions (p < 0.05)".
"Combining these changes, the composite timing metric P3N1 latency (LL) increased by 25.52 ms in BMM sessions (p < 0.05), as shown in Fig. 2D–F, indicating a larger temporal separation between early sensory encoding and later evaluative processing after training."
Huang 2026 (2)¶
Huang, Y., Guo, J.-H., Zheng, S., Yin, R., Wang, J. & Jiang, C.-L. (2026). Enhancing attention network and neural efficiency through brief mindfulness meditation. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00455-1
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Channel-level ANCOVA on post-test P3N1 latency controlling pre-test values, over frontal electrodes. Effects were "observed at F3, F = 5.164, p = 0.027, η2 = 0.083, and Fp2, F = 5.785, p = 0.019, η2 = 0.092".
"signi ficant effects were observed at F3, F = 5.164, p = 0.027, η2 = 0.083, and Fp2, F = 5.785, p = 0.019, η2 = 0.092, with a borderline signi ficant effect at Fz, F = 4.011, p = 0.050, η2 = 0.066"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Sensory Integration — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- BMM reduces stimulus-evoked response magnitude, with posterior-channel amplitude effects at P4 and Oz — related
- Brief mindfulness meditation does not significantly change alerting or orienting network efficiency — related
- Eighteen days of brief mindfulness meditation selectively improves executive control network efficiency in healthy adults — related
- Brief mindfulness meditation speeds overall ANT reaction times without compromising accuracy — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
bmm-expands-p3n1-latency-frontal |
title |
BMM expands the P3N1 latency interval, with frontal-channel group effects at F3, Fp2, and Fz |
description |
BMM expands the P3N1 latency interval, with frontal-channel group effects at F3, Fp2, and Fz |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — huang-2026, huang-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.