Borup et al. (2015) found video feedback more convenient for student support and text-based feedback more convenient for exploratory feedback¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-28 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In Borup et al. (2015)'s mixed-method study, video feedback was perceived as more convenient for student support with more affective value, while text-based feedback was perceived as more convenient for exploratory feedback aligned with efficiency. → Istenič 2021
Evidence¶
Istenič 2021¶
Istenič, A. (2021). Online learning under COVID-19: re-examining the prominence of video-based and text-based feedback. Education Tech Research Dev, 69, 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09955-w
q2 · i? · theoretical · r2
The editorial reports the findings of Borup et al. (2015)'s mixed-method research study comparing video feedback and text-based feedback. The study found "Video feedback was found to be more convenient for student support" while text-based feedback was more convenient for exploratory feedback. No effect sizes are printed.
"Video feedback was found to be more convenient for student support with students' perceiving it as having more affective values, and text-based feedback was found to be more convenient for exploratory feedback aligned with students' perceptions of efficiency."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Human embodiment in video: perceived social presence benefits learning ratings, but instructor-face inclusion shows no significant learning-performance difference, and learners prefer human over robot presenters with mixed recall — related
- Students reported mixed, task-dependent perceptions of the efficiency and speed of voice versus text input — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
borup-2015-video-affective-text-efficiency |
title |
Borup et al. (2015) found video feedback more convenient for student support and text-based feedback more convenient for exploratory feedback |
description |
Borup et al. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
source_checked |
2026-10-28 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — istenič-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.