Both instructor and AI-generated feedback were perceived positively, with instructor feedback rated higher descriptively on all four perception dimensions¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Descriptive results showed both feedback types were perceived positively, with the instructor-feedback group rating feedback higher on fairness (M = 4.59 vs 4.25), usefulness (4.39 vs 3.77), development (4.17 vs 3.99) and encouragement (4.53 vs 4.22). → Er 2024

Evidence¶

Er 2024¶

Er, Erkan; Akçapınar, Gökhan; Bayazıt, Alper; Noroozi, Omid; Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem. (2024). Assessing student perceptions and use of instructor versus AI-generated feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13558

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive statistics from the perception survey (17 instructor, 16 AI students). All mean ratings were above the scale midpoint for both groups; instructor-feedback means were higher on every dimension, though these descriptive differences were not all statistically tested as significant.

"According to descriptive results, both instructor and AI feedback were perceived positively by students. Students who received instructor feedback (ie, group 1) consistently considered feedback more fair ( M = 4.59, SD = 0.46), useful ( M = 4.39, SD = 0.79), developmental ( M = 4.17, SD = 0.84) and encouraging ( M = 4.53, SD = 0.65) compared to students who received AI feedback"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students perceived instructor feedback as significantly more useful than AI-generated feedback, with no significant differences on fairness, developmental value or encouragement — related
• Under blind conditions, students rated GenAI feedback more positively than tutor-generated feedback, with a statistically significant difference only on Genuineness favouring GenAI — reports the opposite
• Most students preferred combined peer and AI feedback over either source alone, and rated peer and ChatGPT feedback as similarly useful — related