Claims

Both the situated learning group and the traditional instruction group improved significantly from pre-test to post-test in vocational English vocabulary

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's post-test mean (28.29, SD 14.04) was significantly higher than its pre-test mean (19.99, SD 6.49), t(58) = -4.43, p < .05. → Özüdoğru and Özüdoğru 2017 q2 i? The experimental group's post-test mean (32.02, SD 13.81) was significantly higher than its pre-test mean (20.26, SD 8.76), t(58) = -5.37, p < .05. → Özüdoğru and Özüdoğru 2017 (2)

Evidence

Özüdoğru and Özüdoğru 2017

Melike Özüdoğru, Fatma Özüdoğru. (2017). The Effect of Situated Learning on Students' Vocational English Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(11): 2037-2044. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051120

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired samples t-test within the control group (N = 58), which received traditional instruction via course book reading, translation, and fill-in-the-blank vocabulary exercises. Mean difference -8.30; the article reports the gain as significant with t(58) = -4.43, p <.05.

"students’ post -test scores were significantly higher than their pre -test scores, t (58) = -4.43, p <.05. Overall results indicated that there was an improvement in the control group between the pre -test and post -test scores."

Özüdoğru and Özüdoğru 2017 (2)

Melike Özüdoğru, Fatma Özüdoğru. (2017). The Effect of Situated Learning on Students' Vocational English Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(11): 2037-2044. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051120

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired samples t-test within the experimental group (N = 58), which received four weeks of situated learning instruction. Mean difference -11.76; the article reports the gain as significant with t(58) = - 5.37, p <.05.

"the post -test mean score of students in the experimental group was significantly higher than their pre -test mean score, t (58) = - 5.37, p <.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.