Claims

The between-group comparison favored the brain teasers curriculum over the National Education Ministry Pre-School curriculum for attention spans

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Attention spans of children who received the brain teasers curriculum differed significantly in favor of the experiment group compared with children who received the National Education Ministry Pre-School curriculum. → Altun 2016

Evidence

Altun 2016

Altun, M., Hazar, M., & Hazar, Z. (2016). Investigation of the Effects of Brain Teasers on Attention Spans of Pre-School Children. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(15), 8112-8119. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Conclusion of the pre-test/post-test controlled experiment with 213 six-year-olds (113 experiment, 100 control). The article reports "a significant difference in favor of the experiment group"; no between-group effect size or test statistic is printed.

"there was a significant difference in favor of the experiment group between the attention spans of children who received the brain teasers curriculum and children who received the National Education Ministry Pre-School curriculum"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.