Claims

The Burgess test correlates more highly with rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) than any other single test, and pairs well with the Thorndike-McCall

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The Burgess test's correlations with the rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) are higher than those of any other test; its lowest correlation except Brown's comprehension is with the Thorndike-McCall (0.48), indicating the two measure different but correlated functions. → Arthur I. Gates 1921

Evidence

Arthur I. Gates 1921

Arthur I. Gates. (1921). An Experimental and Statistical Study of Reading and Reading Tests (Continued). The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0068367

q3 · i3 · associational · r1

Correlational analysis of the Burgess test against rate and comprehension composites and fourteen separate tests across grades III-VIII (Table XI). Printed correlations with the composites are r = 0.82 (rate) and r = 0.80 (comprehension), higher than any other test; the article also reports r = 0.48 with the Thorndike-McCall and calls the two "an excellent team".

"On the whole, the correlation with the composites are high, higher than those yielded by any other test and equally high with rate and comprehension; 0.82 and 0.80 respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id burgess-high-composite-correlations-team-with-thorndike-mccall
title The Burgess test correlates more highly with rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) than any other single test, and pairs well with the Thorndike-McCall
description The Burgess test correlates more highly with rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) than any other single test, and pairs well with the Thorndike-McCall
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1921
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — arthur-i-gates-1921

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.