The Burgess test correlates more highly with rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) than any other single test, and pairs well with the Thorndike-McCall¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 The Burgess test's correlations with the rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) are higher than those of any other test; its lowest correlation except Brown's comprehension is with the Thorndike-McCall (0.48), indicating the two measure different but correlated functions. → Arthur I. Gates 1921
Evidence¶
Arthur I. Gates 1921¶
Arthur I. Gates. (1921). An Experimental and Statistical Study of Reading and Reading Tests (Continued). The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0068367
q3 · i3 · associational · r1
Correlational analysis of the Burgess test against rate and comprehension composites and fourteen separate tests across grades III-VIII (Table XI). Printed correlations with the composites are r = 0.82 (rate) and r = 0.80 (comprehension), higher than any other test; the article also reports r = 0.48 with the Thorndike-McCall and calls the two "an excellent team".
"On the whole, the correlation with the composites are high, higher than those yielded by any other test and equally high with rate and comprehension; 0.82 and 0.80 respectively."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The Thorndike-McCall correlates about 0.50 with other single comprehension tests and 0.69 with a composite of group intelligence tests — related
- Correlations of reading tests with Stanford mental age rise steeply from grade III to grade VI — related
- Vocabulary test scores correlate about 0.6 with reading comprehension but are not an adequate measure of it — related
- Rate tests that mechanically control comprehension yield more reliable results than uncontrolled rate tests — related
- Most reading tests fail to differentiate rate from comprehension — related
- Rate and comprehension composites of silent reading tests correlate 0.84 in elementary grades — related
- Case evidence suggests the Thorndike-McCall diagnoses comprehension power unaffected by reading mechanics, as in a slow reader of above-125 IQ scoring at grade level — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
burgess-high-composite-correlations-team-with-thorndike-mccall |
title |
The Burgess test correlates more highly with rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) than any other single test, and pairs well with the Thorndike-McCall |
description |
The Burgess test correlates more highly with rate and comprehension composites (0.82 and 0.80) than any other single test, and pairs well with the Thorndike-McCall |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1921 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — arthur-i-gates-1921 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.