Computer-assisted Jigsaw II cooperative learning produced significantly higher physics post-test achievement than individualized computer instruction.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students taught physics with computer-assisted Jigsaw II scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught with ICI, after controlling for pre-test scores. → Gambari 2016 q2 i? The Jigsaw II group's mean gain score (48.31) exceeded the ICI group's (41.57). → Gambari 2016 (2)

Evidence¶

Gambari 2016¶

Gambari, I. A. & Yusuf, M. O. (2016). Effects of Computer-Assisted Jigsaw II Cooperative Learning Strategy on Physics Achievement and Retention. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 352-367. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1117586

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on post-test scores of the quasi-experimental study (n = 80, experimental n = 42, control n = 38) with pre-test as covariate. The article reports "an F (1, 77) = 19.072, p = 0.000" for the treatment main effect, a statistically significant difference favoring Jigsaw II.

"Table 1 shows the main effect of treatment group ( computer-assisted Jigsaw II ) on students performance produced an F (1, 77) = 19.072, p = 0.000) for the main effect (treatment) was significant"

Gambari 2016 (2)¶

Gambari, I. A. & Yusuf, M. O. (2016). Effects of Computer-Assisted Jigsaw II Cooperative Learning Strategy on Physics Achievement and Retention. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 352-367. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1117586

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison of mean gain scores in the quasi-experimental study. The article inconsistently reports the Jigsaw II gain as "58.58" in this sentence but as 48.31 in Table 2; both groups improved, with Jigsaw II higher.

"For instance, Jigsaw II had highest mean gain scores o f 58.58 while the ( ICI) had mean gain scores of 41.31."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Both Jigsaw II and ICI groups improved from pre-test to post-test, indicating both benefited from computer-assisted instruction. — related
• Nigerian SS II physics students taught with computer-assisted STAD cooperative learning achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught with Individualized Computer Instruction — related
• Computer-assisted Jigsaw II students retained physics concepts significantly better than ICI students on a delayed test. — related
• Nigerian secondary students taught physics with computer-assisted STAD and LTM cooperative strategies achieved significantly higher posttest scores than students taught with individualized computer instruction — related
• Jigsaw II and animations improved epistemological beliefs more than reading-writing-presentation — related