Camera movement yielded higher spatial presence ratings than no interaction in Desktop-VR¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 In Study 1, interaction format significantly affected spatial presence, with camera movement rated higher than the no interaction condition. → Birgit Brucker 2024

Evidence¶

Birgit Brucker 2024¶

Birgit Brucker, Georg Pardi, Fabienne Uehlin, Laura Moosmann, Martin Lachmair, Marc Halfmann, Peter Gerjets. (2024). How Learners' Visuospatial Ability and Different Ways of Changing the Perspective Influence Learning About Movements in Desktop and Immersive Virtual Reality Environments. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09895-w

q3 · i2 · causal · r?

Study 1 ANCOVA on IPQ spatial presence (N=160) showed a significant format effect, "F(1, 153) = 4.604" with "η2p = .057"; camera movement exceeded no interaction (p = .009) while object movement did not differ from no interaction (p = .427).

"There was a significant main effect of interaction format on spatial presence (F(1, 153) = 4.604, MSE = 1.150, p = .011, η2p = .057). Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons showed that camera movement led to higher spatial presence ratings than the no interaction condition (p = .009)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In Desktop-VR, interaction format (object movement vs. camera movement vs. no interaction) showed no significant main effect on learning outcomes — related