Students identified design limitations of the CAPT system's feedback, including fluctuating scores, lack of constructive improvement suggestions, and monotonous practice¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Participants using MyET complained about scoring fluctuation, wanted more constructive suggestions for improving production, and found prolonged practice with model teachers monotonous and mechanical. → Tsai Pi-hua 2015

Evidence¶

Tsai Pi-hua 2015¶

Tsai Pi-hua. (2015). Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Learning in a Collaborative Context: A Case Study in Taiwan. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077659

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative findings from participants' learning-log reflections on the CAPT system's feedback design; the article also reports complaints about "the fluctuation of scoring" and lacking guidance on how to modify production to match model utterances. No statistics are printed.

"Finally, some of the students consider ed practicing with the m odel teachers monotonous and mechanical after practicing for some time"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The Self-Access CAPT Group reported the highest frequency of self-monitoring of language learning but more difficulties and fewer strategies than the Collaborative Group — related