Captioning second-language videos produces large benefits for comprehension and vocabulary acquisition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-14 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Captioning videos improved second-language comprehension (g = 0.99) and vocabulary acquisition (g = 0.87). → Noetel 2022
Evidence¶
Noetel 2022¶
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3
Synthesis of the Montero Perez et al. (2013) meta-analysis, which the authors rated more favourably on four of seven quality criteria than the alternative review. Captioning showed large effects on second-language comprehension (g = 0.99, k = 15) and vocabulary acquisition (g = 0.87, k = 10).
"This review found captioning led to large benefits for both comprehension (g = 0.99, 95% CI [0.60, 1.38], k = 15; Montero Perez et al., 2013) and vocabulary acquisition (g = 0.87, 95% CI [0.58, 1.15], k = 10; Montero Perez et al., 2013)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Oral Language — outcome: instruction changes it
- Vocabulary — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- On-screen text that duplicates the narration of a diagram can hurt learning, but spoken–written redundancy is not harmful on average and helps over spoken-only presentation in some conditions — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Adventure video games with supplementary vocabulary material outperform control conditions on receptive and productive vocabulary tests — related
- Digital game-based learning supports long-term retention of second-language vocabulary — related
- Combining textual and pictorial glosses improves incidental vocabulary learning more than single-mode glosses — related
- Captioned-video groups significantly outperform a no-captioning control on form recognition and clip association of target words, with no differences among captioning types — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Bimodal captioned input improved L2 listening skills, generalizing to unfamiliar sentences and speakers (attributed to Charles & Trenkic, 2015) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Earlier meta-analyses, as reported second-hand, find that glosses improve L2 vocabulary learning and that text-and-picture glosses outperform single-mode glosses — related
- Incidental vocabulary exposure produces reliable learning, but learners pick up only a small share of the unknown words they meet — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
captioning-second-language-videos-large-benefits |
title |
Captioning second-language videos produces large benefits for comprehension and vocabulary acquisition |
description |
Captioning second-language videos produces large benefits for comprehension and vocabulary acquisition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-14 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — noetel-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.