Smartphone access among informal caregivers ranges from 61% to 99% depending on country¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most informal caregivers have smartphone access, ranging from 61% in India to 99% in the United States. → Pereira Dauster Souza; Pereira Priscilla Perez da Silva 2025
Evidence¶
Pereira Dauster Souza; Pereira Priscilla Perez da Silva 2025¶
Pereira Dauster Souza; Pereira Priscilla Perez da Silva. (2025). Self-directed learning of informal caregivers using mobile health: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13019-7
q2 · i? · review · r3
Review synthesis of cross-sectional studies reporting that "Most informal caregivers have access to smartphones with a frequency that varied between 61% in India [24] reaching 99% of respondents in the United States of America [22]".
"Most informal caregivers have access to smartphones with a frequency that varied between 61% in India [24] reaching 99% of respondents in the United States of America [22]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Internet access and trust in information are the main barriers to caregiver self-directed learning via mobile health — related
- Virtual and in-person parent-to-parent forums deepened caregivers' sense of community and support — related
- Informal caregivers tend to seek more health information on the internet than non-caregivers — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.