In a cluster randomized study across 73 high schools, Carnegie Learning students scored higher on the Algebra Proficiency Exam, with cohort effect sizes of +0.07 and +0.21¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In comparison with schools following a traditional Algebra I curriculum, schools using Carnegie Learning High School Math Solution Algebra I scored higher on the Algebra Proficiency Exam (effect size = +0.07) in the first cohort. → Carnegie Learning High School Math Solution Algebra I 2014 q3 i? Results for the second cohort were significantly positive, with an effect size of +0.21. → Carnegie Learning High School Math Solution Algebra I 2014

Evidence¶

Carnegie Learning High School Math Solution Algebra I 2014¶

Carnegie Learning High School Math Solution Algebra I. (2014). Evidence summary, strong rating, 3 studies. https://evidenceforessa.org/program/carnegie-learning-high-school-math-solution/

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Cluster randomized effectiveness study (RAND Corporation, Pane et al., 2014) with two cohorts in 73 high schools across 7 states and over 13,000 students. The summary reports "students in schools using Carnegie Learning High School Math Solution Algebra I scored higher on the Algebra Proficiency Exam (effect size = +0.07)" and a second-cohort effect size of +0.21.

"One cluster randomized study evaluated Carnegie Learning's blended solution with two separate cohorts of students in 73 high schools across 7 states with over 13,000 students."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Algebra ability level differences appear on both criteria with no treatment-by-ability interaction — related
• Carnegie Learning High School Math Solution Algebra I shows a weighted average effect size of +0.04 across three qualifying studies — related