Claims

Advantage of causal knowledge on unfamiliar terminology persists one week after training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? One week after training, causal-mechanism-trained novices outperform feature-list-trained novices on cases using unfamiliar terminology. → Woods 2007

Evidence

Woods 2007

Woods, N.N., Brooks, L.R. & Norman, G.R. (2007). The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9054-y

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Experiment 2: delayed post-test one week after initial training. The article reports that "Participants with knowledge of causal mechanisms were found to do better on cases with unfamiliar terminology." No effect size is printed.

"In Experiment 2, participants are tested 1 week after initial training. Participants with knowledge of causal mechanisms were found to do better on cases with unfamiliar terminology."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id causal-knowledge-advantage-unfamiliar-terminology-persists-one-week
title Advantage of causal knowledge on unfamiliar terminology persists one week after training
description Advantage of causal knowledge on unfamiliar terminology persists one week after training
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — woods-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.