Claims

Computer assisted vocabulary instruction produces a statistically significant vocabulary gain in preschool EFL children

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Preschool children taught 20 target vocabulary words through computer assisted vocabulary instruction improved significantly from pre-test to post-test, with a large eta squared effect. → Basoz 2016

Evidence

Basoz 2016

Basoz, T. & Can, T., D. (2016). The effectiveness of computers on vocabulary learning among preschool children: A semiotic approach. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 11(1), 02-08. http://sproc.org/ojs/index.php/cjes/

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-test on the CAVI experimental group (n=16) in a quasi-experimental pre/post study. The article reports "A statistically significant difference" between pre- and post-test, with eta squared (.09) described as a large effect size; no standardised effect size is printed.

"A statistically significant difference was found between the group’s pre-test (M= .31, SD= .70) and post-test scores (M=13.31, SD= 4.28), t (15)= -13.57, p< .05 (two-tailed). The eta squared statistic (.09) indicated a large effect size."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.