Claims

Case-based discussions show evidence of reasoning and learning occurring and are perceived as useful for teaching and learning by oncology registrars and consultants

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? A small qualitative study of 6 clinical oncology specialty registrars and 6 consultant clinical oncologists concluded that reasoning and learning were taking place during case-based discussions and that CBDs were perceived as useful. → Vundum Jonathon 2025

Evidence

Vundum Jonathon 2025

Vundum Jonathon, Day Fiona. (2025). Evaluating the Efficacy of Case-Based Learning for Medical Oncology Trainees: A Systematic Review. Journal of Cancer Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02651-w

q1 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative study (Jyothirmayi, 2012) recording and transcribing CBDs for conversational analysis plus semi-structured interviews with 12 participants (6 registrars, 6 consultants). The review reports the study "concluded that reasoning and learning were taking place during CBDs"; knowledge retention was not examined.

"The study concluded that reasoning and learning were taking place during CBDs and that they were perceived as useful."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.