Claims

The article reports the achievement change was statistically significant and contingently influenced by cognition, with Fo (41.92) bigger than Ft (3.99)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors report the change caused by CBI was significant (significance 0.00 < 0.05) and that academic improvement was contingently influenced by cognition. → Gunarhadi 2016

Evidence

Gunarhadi 2016

Gunarhadi, Sunardi, Mohammad Anwar, Tri Rejeki Andayani, Abdull Sukor Shaari. (2016). +THE EFFECT OF CLUSTER-BASED INSTRUCTION ON MATHEMATIC ACHIEVEMENT IN INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS. International Journal of Special Education, 31(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099973

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' interpretation in the Discussion section, reporting an F comparison (Fo (41.92) bigger than Ft (3.99)) and a significance value of 0.00 < 0.05 for the cognition influence. This analysis is not presented in the Results section and no effect size is printed.

"The change caused by CBI was significant since the statistical analysis, showed with the value of significance 0.00< 0.05, Fo (41.92) was bigger than Ft (3.99). In the same way, the academic improvement was also contingently influenced by cognition as shown from the value of 0.00< 0.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.