Treatment version significantly affects student attitudes, with the lean program most negative and no-practice next¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2003 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A MANOVA on the 12 attitude items revealed a significant overall difference among the six treatment groups. → Martin 2003
q3 i? The lean program group had the most negative attitudes (21 significant negative comparisons) and the no-practice group the next most (10). → Martin 2003
Evidence¶
Martin 2003¶
Martin, F., Klein, J., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Effects of Instructional Events in Computer-Based Instruction. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED484984
q3 · i? · causal · r2
MANOVA on the 12-item Likert attitude survey administered after the lesson and posttest showed "F (60, 1188.48) = 12.98, p <.01"; univariate tests were significant on 11 of 12 items. Scheffe summaries showed the lean group with 21 significant negative comparisons and no-practice with 10.
"A MANOVA conducted on the overall attitude data revealed a significant overall difference on the 12 attitude questions, F (60, 1188.48) = 12.98, p <.01. Follow-up univariate analyses indicated significant differences on 11 of the 12 attitude survey items at the p<.01 level."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students may be unaware of the absence of objectives: the no-objectives group gave the highest ratings on objective-related attitude items — related
- In one experiment with 256 undergraduates, computer-based lesson versions that included practice produced significantly higher posttest scores than versions without practice — related
- Linguist review of draft items revealed communication problems with terminology and imprecisely reasoned attitude statements — related
- Students notice the absence of practice and examples: attitude items about those events are rated lower when the events are missing — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cbi-version-affects-attitudes-lean-most-negative |
title |
Treatment version significantly affects student attitudes, with the lean program most negative and no-practice next |
description |
Treatment version significantly affects student attitudes, with the lean program most negative and no-practice next |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2003 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — martin-2003 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.