Claims

Case-based learning groups achieved significantly higher post-test acquisition scores than control groups in an Introduction to Educational Science course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Post-test scores of both the CBL1 and CBL2 experimental groups differed significantly from the control groups' post-test scores. → İlhan-Beyaztaş and Özdemir 2018 q3 i? The omnibus one-way ANOVA on post-test scores across departments was statistically significant. → İlhan-Beyaztaş and Özdemir 2018

Evidence

İlhan-Beyaztaş and Özdemir 2018

Dilek İlhan-Beyaztaş, Burhanettin Özdemir. (2018). The Effect of Case-Based Curriculum on Cognitive and Affective Characteristics of Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.3035

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Semi-experimental pretest-posttest control group study with 334 freshmen; one-way ANOVA on post-test scores of experimental and control departments was significant (F 4-199=8.063, p=0.00<0.05), followed by Fisher's LSD post hoc tests comparing groups.

"According to results in Table 5, there was a statistically significant difference between the post -test scores of at least two departments according to the one-way ANOV A results on the post-test scores of the departments presented in Table 5 (F 4-199=8.063, p=0.00<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.