Claims

CBL is the most effective method overall for both theoretical and practical neurology teaching outcomes, with no evidence of publication bias

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The NMA concluded CBL is the optimal strategy when theoretical or practical test scores measure neurology education effectiveness. → Li Xiangyu 2024 q3 i? Begg's tests and comparison-adjusted funnel plots found no publication bias (theoretical P = 0.060; practical P = 0.348). → Li Xiangyu 2024 (2)

Evidence

Li Xiangyu 2024

Li Xiangyu, Zhang Longsheng, Sun Wenjun, Lei Min, Li Ying, Zhang Jiacheng, Huang Xing. (2024). Comparison of the effects of different teaching methods on the effectiveness of teaching neurology in China: a bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06397-9

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The discussion's summary of the Bayesian NMA of 31 RCTs involving 2,124 students and 7 teaching methods; CBL ranked first on both outcomes (SUCRA 98.4% theoretical, 89.2% practical). This is the authors' synthesis conclusion, not a standardized effect size.

"CBL is the optimal strategy when we use theoretical or practical test scores to measure the effect of neurology education."

Li Xiangyu 2024 (2)

Li Xiangyu, Zhang Longsheng, Sun Wenjun, Lei Min, Li Ying, Zhang Jiacheng, Huang Xing. (2024). Comparison of the effects of different teaching methods on the effectiveness of teaching neurology in China: a bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06397-9

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Publication-bias assessment of the NMA: Begg's tests and comparison-adjusted funnel plots showed symmetric scatter for theoretical exam scores (P = 0.060) and practical skill scores (P = 0.348), indicating no small-sample effect or publication bias.

"The results of Begg' tests suggested no publication bias in the included studies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.