Claims

Case-based learning yields significantly higher psychology exam scores than lecture-based teaching, with a pooled Hedges' g of 0.68 under a random effects model

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q4 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i2 Across 15 RCTs with 2172 participants, students taught with CBL scored significantly higher on exams than students in lecture-based groups (Hedges' g = 0.68, 95%CI 0.49–0.88). → Wu Fanghui 2023

Evidence

Wu Fanghui 2023

Wu Fanghui, Wang Tao, Yin Danxu, Xu Xiaoxiao, Jin Cancan, Mu Nan, Tan Qingrong. (2023). Application of case-based learning in psychology teaching: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04525-5

q4 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis pooling 15 RCTs (1086 CBL vs 1086 lecture students) using Hedges' g under a random effects model; the article reports "Hedges’ g = 0.68, 95%CI (0.49, 0.88)" with high heterogeneity (I2 = 78.90%).

"the total effect of CBL yielded better results than lecture-based learning [Hedges’ g = 0.68, 95%CI (0.49, 0.88), p < 0.00]. The heterogeneity was relatively high (I2= 78.90%, p < 0.00), suggesting that a random effects model should be applied."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.