Claims

The CBS advantage over RTM in chemistry achievement persists after adjusting post-test scores for prior attainment using KCPE as covariate

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ANCOVA with KCPE as covariate still showed a statistically significant difference between groups exposed to CBS and control groups. → Mihindo W. Jane 2017

Evidence

Mihindo W. Jane 2017

Mihindo W. Jane, Wachanga S.W. & Anditi Z. O. (2017). Effects of Computer-Based Simulations Teaching Approach on Students’ Achievement in the Learning of Chemistry among Secondary School Students in Nakuru Sub County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133108

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA of post-test CAT scores for the four groups with KCPE marks as covariate, conducted because intact groups could differ initially. The article reports "statistically significant difference F (3,170) = 9.2 38"; Bonferroni pairwise comparisons showed both experimental groups significantly exceeded both control groups.

"The results in Table 9 shows that there was still s tatistically significant difference F (3,170) = 9.2 38, p<0.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.