The CBS advantage over RTM in chemistry achievement persists after adjusting post-test scores for prior attainment using KCPE as covariate¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? ANCOVA with KCPE as covariate still showed a statistically significant difference between groups exposed to CBS and control groups. → Mihindo W. Jane 2017
Evidence¶
Mihindo W. Jane 2017¶
Mihindo W. Jane, Wachanga S.W. & Anditi Z. O. (2017). Effects of Computer-Based Simulations Teaching Approach on Students’ Achievement in the Learning of Chemistry among Secondary School Students in Nakuru Sub County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133108
q2 · i? · causal · r1
ANCOVA of post-test CAT scores for the four groups with KCPE marks as covariate, conducted because intact groups could differ initially. The article reports "statistically significant difference F (3,170) = 9.2 38"; Bonferroni pairwise comparisons showed both experimental groups significantly exceeded both control groups.
"The results in Table 9 shows that there was still s tatistically significant difference F (3,170) = 9.2 38, p<0.05."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.