Claims

The training effect on academic procrastination persisted at a four-week follow-up

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's follow-up APS mean remained significantly lower than the control group's four weeks after the program ended. → Betül Toker 2015 q2 i? Within the experimental group, posttest and follow-up means did not differ significantly, indicating maintained gains. → Betül Toker 2015 (2)

Evidence

Betül Toker 2015

Betül Toker, Raşit Avcı. (2015). Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral-Theory-based Skill Training on Academic Procrastination Behaviors of University Students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.0077

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Follow-up measurement obtained four weeks after the posttest in the same quasi-experimental study (n = 26). The experimental group's follow-up mean (44.09) was lower than the control group's (58.92): "a significant difference between the follow-up test means for the experimental group vs. control group".

"there was a significant difference between the follow-up test means for the experimental group vs. control group [t(24) = 3.439, p < .01]."

Betül Toker 2015 (2)

Betül Toker, Raşit Avcı. (2015). Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral-Theory-based Skill Training on Academic Procrastination Behaviors of University Students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.0077

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Within-group repeated-measures t-test in the same study found no significant difference between the experimental group's posttest and follow-up means, which the authors read as persistence of the training effect; equivalence was not tested.

"There was no significant difference between the posttest and follow-up test means [t (12) = 1.26, p > .05]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.