ELA gains in CCSPP schools (0.05 SD) were not statistically significant overall but were significant for English learners and, at p < 0.10, for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Overall ELA gains of 0.05 SD were not statistically significant, though ELA effects were significant for English learners (p < 0.05) and for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students (p < 0.10). → Swain 2025
Evidence¶
Swain 2025¶
Swain, W., Leung-Gagné, M., Maier, A., & Rubinstein, C. (2025). Community schools impact on student outcomes: Evidence from California. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/541.498
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Matched difference-in-differences analysis of first-cohort CCSPP schools reports overall ELA gains of 0.05 SD (about 36 days of learning per the executive summary) that were "not statistically significant overall", with subgroup-level significance as printed; no standardized effect size for the subgroup contrasts is printed.
"While improvements in English language arts (ELA) were not statistically significant overall, they were notably significant for English learners (p <0.05) and for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students (p <0.10)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- CCSPP community schools reduced chronic absence at least 30% more than matched comparison schools in the first implementation year — related
- By 2023–24, CCSPP Cohort 1 community schools' math and ELA scores exceeded their prepandemic achievement levels, an outcome not observed in comparable non-CCSPP schools — related
- Benefits of CCSPP community schools were largest for Black students, English learners, and socioeconomically disadvantaged students — a broader claim this one bears on
- CCSPP community schools improved math achievement by 0.06 standard deviations, roughly 43 additional days of learning — related
- CCSPP community schools reduced suspension rates by roughly 15% (0.5 percentage point) relative to matched comparison schools — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ccspp-ela-gains-subgroup-significant-only |
title |
ELA gains in CCSPP schools (0.05 SD) were not statistically significant overall but were significant for English learners and, at p < 0.10, for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students |
description |
ELA gains in CCSPP schools (0.05 SD) were not statistically significant overall but were significant for English learners and, at p < 0.10, for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — swain-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.