Claims

ELA gains in CCSPP schools (0.05 SD) were not statistically significant overall but were significant for English learners and, at p < 0.10, for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Overall ELA gains of 0.05 SD were not statistically significant, though ELA effects were significant for English learners (p < 0.05) and for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students (p < 0.10). → Swain 2025

Evidence

Swain 2025

Swain, W., Leung-Gagné, M., Maier, A., & Rubinstein, C. (2025). Community schools impact on student outcomes: Evidence from California. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/541.498

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Matched difference-in-differences analysis of first-cohort CCSPP schools reports overall ELA gains of 0.05 SD (about 36 days of learning per the executive summary) that were "not statistically significant overall", with subgroup-level significance as printed; no standardized effect size for the subgroup contrasts is printed.

"While improvements in English language arts (ELA) were not statistically significant overall, they were notably significant for English learners (p <0.05) and for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students (p <0.10)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ccspp-ela-gains-subgroup-significant-only
title ELA gains in CCSPP schools (0.05 SD) were not statistically significant overall but were significant for English learners and, at p < 0.10, for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students
description ELA gains in CCSPP schools (0.05 SD) were not statistically significant overall but were significant for English learners and, at p < 0.10, for socioeconomically disadvantaged and Black students
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — swain-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.