Claims

Conceptual change texts were more effective than traditional teaching across the nine concepts, though the democracy concept remained difficult

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Per-item analysis showed CCT teaching was more effective for all nine concepts, but experimental students still had difficulty with democracy and control students with republic, democracy, government/state and central administration. → Dağdelen and Kosterelioglu 2015

Evidence

Dağdelen and Kosterelioglu 2015

Orhan Dağdelen, İlker Kösterelioğlu. (2015). Effect of Conceptual Change Texts for Overcoming Misconceptions in “People and Management” Unit. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 99-112. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078838

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive per-item percentage analysis of misconception frequencies (Table 6) across the nine concepts in both groups. The article also states teaching with CCTs "was more effective in teaching concepts" compared to traditional methods, and reports a significant increase in the experimental group in all items other than one democracy question.

"Table 6 presents that students in experimental group still have difficulty in learning democracy concept and control group students have difficulty with the following concepts: republic, democracy, government/state and central administration."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.